Nationalist Civil Disobedience or Separatism
Reconquista, author of the much praised series of essays entitled ‘From Titans to Lemmings’, has come to the concluding part of his works.
His latest piece encourages nationalists to offer forth their own view on whether the Titans can be saved, and if so, which course of action we need to consider should the political route seem doomed to fail.
Reconquista offers two alternatives: Civil Disobedience or Separatism.
Civil Disobedience would be an interesting move, not least the reaction of the media to a tactic best known for its association with the Indian resistance to the British rule of India, and the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa. It would involve some pretty impressive smearing to recast non-violent protesters against oppression as violent fascists. But, it is more likely that the enemies of British patriots would engineer a situation where the protesters would be classed as terrorists, and that opens up a plethora of new laws to use against us.
Any form of protests involving the Nationalist scene is likely to attract all manner of seedy little groups, the types that the party has - often painfully – tried to distance itself from. They have attached themselves to the marches of the EDL and they will tag along with any street activity that replaces the relatively boring political route.
The problem, as I see it, is that you would either need huge numbers of people acting simultaneously or a smaller group of people whom are willing to risk the loss of their liberty – the state would come down hard upon the first groups as an example. This also raises questions over the use of new powers to deal with protesters codified within the Lisbon Treaty.
It does come down to the will of the British people or lack thereof. Those feeling uncomfortable with their changing surroundings have merely taken the easier route; those with the financial ability fled the enriched communities, rather than protest. This phenomenon is echoed all over the Anglosphere and Europe.
Reconquista has cited the efforts by Eugene Terr’blanche – the leader of the AWB – who is the campaigning for a secessionist Afrikaner state within South Africa. By land mass, South Africa is 5 times the size of the United Kingdom and has 25 million fewer people spread over that vast landscape, and yet, Terr’Blanche is likely to be laughed out of the Hague when he states his case. However, the relentless march of multiculturalism has created separate communities within the UK, and the demands for a separate Muslim state within a state cannot be far off. The only indigenous folk that live in ‘enriched’ areas are the ones who don’t have the economic means to escape from the ghettos.
Separatist areas exist already, albeit unofficially. Only the purveyors of mass immigration can afford to live within them.
No, our government, or the fascist EU commission, will never recognise a purely indigenous state within a state, nor grant permission for the formation of it.
Anyhow, I’m not sure I would enjoy living like an American Indian on a reserve.
The political route is painfully slow, and every year brings another round of humiliation for decent right thinking people. But I’m not convinced that it is a dead end, not until this avenue is exhausted will I try other tactics. British Nationalists whom have called for the abandonment of the political process have by and large been revealed as nothing of the sort. Reconquista shouldn’t be surprised if he awakens suspicions about his motives.
When you’re falling off a cliff you’ll take any anchor you can and pray it holds.
Loading ...
Leave your response!