Bankrupt BNP – It’s Not Impossible
A contributor on the yourbnp website has written a post regarding a scenario that has real potential to become reality, namely, that regardless of the leadership challenge, the British National Party (BNP) will be bankrupted before the end of this year.
According to reports, organisers have been ordered by BNP HQ to ‘squeeze’ their local membership for donations and to pursue every enquiry received, in the hope of boosting the party’s dire financial situation. Indeed, it is alleged that those on the payroll have yet to receive their monthly salary and there is reference to 3-month-old outstanding invoices – in the business world this is the precursor to collapse.
The author goes on to suggest abandoning the BNP’s ‘civil war’ and begin building a new organisation:
When Eddy Butler wins the leadership contest OR is ‘rigged’ to lose the BNP will still be a bankrupted organisation without an ‘active’ membership capable of achieving the goal of a Great Britain.
That will leave many loyal Britons needing to organise themselves into a coherent group to take on the task of creating an organisation that will be able to achieve that goal of a Great Britain.
The question is “Why are we playing a no-win game of ‘battle the crooks to win an argument’ ?
It would be far quicker and more productive to simply step to one side, let the present bunch fight their own useless battles, alone ! whilst loyal Brits get on with the work that really is required.
Now some will say a new party is not needed, wanted or possible just now, well take a look.
All the proposed changes will amount to practically a new party, just the same name.
If Eddy Butler is ‘rigged’ out of the leadership contest then no doubt he will consider forming a new group.
When the legal leeches have finished their bloodletting will there be a party left or just a bankrupted name ?
I would consider joining a new party, but I wouldn’t want the name to resemble anything remotely like the BNP. As one reply to this post suggested the name: “British Freedom Party”, which as an acronym becomes the ‘BFP’. In my opinion we would constantly be plagued on the doorstep by an electorate which would believe the BNP and the BFP were interchangeable, worse, we would end up in a situation where the electorate would be drawn into thinking that we’re basically the same party, with all the unsavoury baggage that association with the BNP brings.
I would expect the name to represent a new and radical organisation, and to reflect the new relevance of 21st century British Nationalism in a world which seems hell-bent on further globalisation. There is a large and growing resistance to what people are beginning to perceive as a new ordering of the world; the loss of national sovereignty, interference from transnational organisations and wealth redistribution from the developed world to the undeveloped – without so much as the permission of national electorates. These people are young, intelligent, dynamic, passionate and they could be brought around to the understanding that only nationalism stands in the path of the internationalist elite.
Unfortunately, most of these activists will not join an organisation that resembles the BNP in all but name. I suppose what I’m saying is that we should make a clean break from the British National Party.
The goal was to drag British Nationalism out of the gutter, and the BNP, as the vehicle expected to carry out this task, failed.
[...] Party are lurching from bad to worse following reports its staff were not paid last month, sparking speculation on nationalist websites that the party could go bankrupt. With the leadership struggling to manage [...]
Leave your response!