Griffin and Brons

There’s conflicting messages emanating from party HQ.

At the Indigenous Forum, Griffin tried to cast the reformists as civic nationalists. Today, Andrew Brons mentions “splinter groups” who are trying to pick up members that disagreed with the constitutional amendments. Excuse me, Andrew? Which splinter groups? The National Front made an effort to skim off disgruntled BNP members, but they’re hardly a splinter group, they’re a political party in their own right. Andrew knows this of course, so who is he talking about? He couldn’t possibly be contradicting Mr Chairman and claiming that the reform group are not civic nationalists, but hardcore racial nationalists, could he?

Either way, this is HQ trying to drag this debate onto ideological grounds. Anybody who reads this site knows that the issues we highlight aren’t ideological. They are administrative, constitutional, and financial.

The appearance of Andrew Brons, begging for alms, is a blow for Griffin. It proves that he’s lost his saleability. He can’t raise the funds by fronting campaigns by himself. In the real world, outside of his circle of sycophantic cultists, Nick Griffin is given his due, by which I mean, aside from making lengthy essays complete with catastrophe theories and delivering lectures to his own supporters – there really isn’t anything special about Mr Griffin. The sooner people realise that Griffin isn’t Churchillian in any possible sense, the better.

I don’t envy the lackey that had to deliver a blow to Griffin’s hubris and announce that it really would be better to use Andrew Brons.

We had this amusing comment in support of Griffin, from Mr Grayling:

“While the cackling gaggle of disgruntled Geese such as yourselves continue to make the awful anti BNP/Griffin sounds, it will get worse won`t it!
Griffins the man for the job.- Get used to it.”

Here we go again, another Griffinite who cannot distinguish between the party and its leader. I suppose I shouldn’t be too harsh, the internal culture has for too long sought to blur the lines between Nick Griffin and the party. A lot of people using this site are recovering Griffinites, they managed to escape the personality cult. When you’re ready to re-enter reality we’ll be here to help, Mr Grayling.

Some reasons why Sir Nicholas is not the man for the job.

1. His tolerance of the disgraceful conduct of his trusted lieutenants during the nomination process.
2. His contempt for the party constitution and therefore its membership, displayed during the nomination process.
3. The consolidation of his own personal power within the party, brought about by scaremongering. The manipulation of the voting membership.
4. Bestowing huge powers upon Jim Dowson. Allowing the man to gain control of most of the party’s operations (only those which money can be made from).
5. His failure to produce financial transparency over the past 10 years. Accounts locked away.
6. Mass purges, expulsions and suspensions. Mostly unconstitutional.
7. The unlawful firing of party staff.
8. Provoking completely avoidable litigation against the party as a way of fund-raising.
9. Causing the complete wipe out in Barking and Dagenham.
10. Failure to discipline his pet officials. (This caused some of the most catastrophic set backs).
11. The promotion of sycophants regardless of their blatant ineptitude. All to the detriment of the party.

There are more…….

Related Posts :

The Greek Golden Dawn

The National Front Reborn?

Nationalist Unity: My Way, or No Way

The Far-Left Fears Us